FORUMS

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: Movie?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    1

    Angry

    I really, really hope no one decides to make a movie out of any of the necroscope books, because it would most likely turn out to be a cheesy b movie that might make it to usa up all night. although I would like to see a visual interpretation of the wamphyri.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    1

    Post

    A movie would be extremely cool. The story lends itself well for movies. It could be done, if well executed. The problem with horrormovies is, that there tends to be too much humour in them. It should be vicious, brooding and bloody (eeh, like Necroscope?).
    And the rating problem. The movie should be made for adult audiences (the only way).
    I think the first evil dead movie is one of the coolest horrors ever made. Damn scary stuff there. Now someone should make Necroscope into a movie with today's possibilities in the effects department.
    Let's hope it will be made and i agree with you, that it would be a damn shame if it turns out like a cheesy b-movie.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    13

    Post

    I agree that it should not be made into a movie. It just seems to me that it would not do any justice to the book and vice versa. There is just too much detail, histroy, characters, etc....... that it would take more than 3 hours just to get a good story line. Not that I don't want to see it done. If someone had all the right staff, special effects people, directors, actors etc... then it might be possible, but to get all of this stuff right it would cost you a wad of cash.

  4. #4
    Emaleth Guest

    Post

    Hmm..isn't that movie "Evil Dead" the one where that guy's hand was possessed and trying to kill him? If so..sorry but that was the funniest movie I have ever seen, I just couldn't see the horror in it.

    As for the movie. I agree that it would have to be a lengthy movie in order to even touch the detail that Brian gets through his books. I had "TV/Cable Mini-Series" run through my head, but that would ruin it being splattered throughout with commercials. But on the other hand, you could spread it out two, three days. And then doing that, even with cable I'm sure you could do that, you could have the movie sold all in one, like Braveheart, or whatever, two, three video sets.

    Rambling again I am sure.. :-

  5. #5
    topol_sheap Guest

    Post

    <font color="#990000">The movie that you are thinking of is Evil Dead II: dead by dawn. Very funny movie, but it has been said to be the only movie that only has things that it needs. No extra bits that are not needed.....

    I could ramble on about the evil dead trilogy fot a couple of days, but I am sure that no one would care..............

    A good place to find out about movies is:
    The internet Movie Database It really is the most comprehensive guide that I have found out there.....(I am not marketing their site either!)

    I think I may have to start a new topic elsewhere now as I have had an IDEA!!!</font>

    [This message has been edited by topol_sheap (edited February 24, 2000).]

    [This message has been edited by topol_sheap (edited February 24, 2000).]

    [This message has been edited by topol_sheap (edited February 24, 2000).]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    43

    Angry

    Oh ok you think that there is to much detial in the story to make a movie remember that a movie can show about 20 pages worth of writing in about 4 mins!!!! Even less when it is nothing but dialong!


    What about a serial? YOu know the used to do that back in the old days! Also the movie doesnt have to the expenisive! In the movie aliens they only had like 4 or 5 human suits to work with.

    I am all for a movie as long as brian rights or co-rights the script! and working with the production crew



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Posts
    2

    Lightbulb

    Hi All,
    The entire series could make fantastic films if it's done right. I think suggesting that it 'would be bad' just because other films have been massacred isn't entirely true. It simply needs to be done the right way, by the right people, without compromising. Firstly, you'd need to get Brian in on the script. Working with a professional script writer or writers. Secondly concentrating on ONLY the first book...make that into a two hour movie, don't try to get the whole lot into one movie. When I say without compromising I mean without compromising. Anne Rice's book became an instant hit when the movie was released, it didn't only make the movie worthwhile doing, it also gave her novels record sales...and lets face it...compared with Brian Lumley she might as well have been my eight year old daughter. There obviously would need to be a lot of discussion as to the rating, personally of course you'd have to say R 18+, but, if you read the rules of censorship you can get away with quite a lot in an MA 15+ movie (the only way a professional film company would take it on). If it wasn't going to be done properly, obviously noone here wants to see a tacky version put out. Which leads me to money. I don't know whether Brian hears what's said on here or not, but I hope some of it filters down to him...mostly because he does an absolutely fantastic job, he is the ultimate horror/fantasy novelist. We don't want to see his books turned into the trashy movies Stephen King seems to have turned to. Anyhow...money...what if...and I know this is conjectural...don't know if it's ever been done before, but...what if the movie itself was floated on the stock exchange? Anyone around the world could buy shares in the movie. This wouldn't fund the entire movie, but would most likely get the ear of the big movie producers. I guess the main question then is...is there enough Brian Lumley followers out there who'd buy a share in his movie? I mean a legal share too...where you own x% of the movie takings. There's very few movies that don't end up making profits...and done properly this could snowball into something very special. Given that you've already got the starting point of a story which is by far the best vampire story ever written, it's not ALL blood and guts all our horror, Brian knows how to build characters and I know that if he was to work on the script that a movie could be made to do justice to his work. At the moment, there's a select few people (on a global scale) who are aware of his work, I'm one of them, you're one of them, but there are literally millions who haven't discovered his genius. Just because they haven't picked his book up off the shelf doesn't mean they can't share in the story. Let's not be selfish and say but it will destroy 'my' vision. After all, you will still keep your vision, you'll just be sharing in someone elses...and if it's Brian's...then...I want to see it! Love to hear some feedback from this, so send me email or post replies here (or both preferably). As for who plays Lardis...definitely Harrison Ford!! Oh..and Wratha or Lady Karen has to be Catherine Zeta Jones.
    Will Kruss
    Webstrike Solutions http://www.webstrikesolutions.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    239

    Post

    This movie would have to be done in anumber of movies, c'mon the starwars saga isn't even complete yet and people love it.
    it wouod have to have a global appeal though and im not quite sure that it would happen.
    But i know of many people that would certainly buy it just for the sake that it had the words Brian lumley on it

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    1

    Thumbs up

    A movie, hmmmm. Well on balance yes. The first necroscope book would make a great movie on it's own and would provide a forum in which a screenplay and direction could be developed for the later books. Violence and sex could be used or limited with out any detrimental effect on such a powerful story. The stories are basically character based so the actors would have to be top class although not necessarily famous. Any film would require major input from Brian himself and the net is the obvious tool for reader input. No low budget film(s) could do these books justice. A classy production is the only real option. The big issue would be getting a director brave enough and a studio with the guts to back him/her all the way.(we're talking the 'Lord of The Rings' of horror here)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    43

    Post

    here here on the last post!!

    As I just said in the other topic! BRian Lumley NEcroscope is the Lord of the Rings of Horror!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    110

    Post

    You know Rashagoth - I agree

    Especially the Vampire World Trilogy!! No other could have told that story as good as Mr Lumley.
    Bloody Brilliant!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    1

    Post

    how bout those japanese manga guys doing a wicked animation series . bet they could pull it off

  13. #13

    Post

    I've said it before...
    I'll say it again....

    Film(s) would be a bad idea.

    Oks Im no Film Expert, and all this is just my simple views on the matter, so put me right by all means

    I could rattle on for ages about BL's input and money and all the other positive things that could make the films into a success, but in my humble opinion, a film could never do the book justice.
    No way could a film company content itself with just doing 'one' book in a film - we'd get some dodgy amalgam.
    I think a Series of Films, whilst sounding like a good idea in theory, would falter in consistency from film to film.

    As much as I'd (we'd)love BL to make multi-mega £ thru film making, methinks it would be best left buried, so to speak....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    5

    Talking

    While i love the Necroscope series, a movie would be an entriely bad idea. The books are great, but what makes them great is the ability to use your imagination. Imagining what the Whampyri, their homeland, and their aeries look like is left to your part of the suspense. Having these things portrayed according to someone else's imagination is like stealing thoughts if you will. Leave it be and you will keep your adoring fans.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    15

    Wink

    I think that the Necroscope Series should be made into a movies, as long as the script stayed true to the books. I do agree that it should be a series of movies to do true justice for the books. I don't know about you, but I would love to see how Hollywood would portray Harry using the Mobius Continuum.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Posts
    46

    Post

    To quote (loosely) from The Maxx: "I don't have a [movie] now, but that's OK. The episodes are always better...

    IN MY MIND!!!"

    Cheers!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    8
    WillK,
    I do think the Necroscope series could be done into a movie. It would probably have to be more than 13 movies long. Since I think that some of the books would have to be split up. If Lumley himself was in on everything and didn't fold like Anne Rice, then it could be done. I would love to see his complete visual interpretation of the series. But it would cost bucu bucks, probably more than Star Wars to really do it justice. Computer graphics combined with good old fashioned special fx would really bring out everything. Your idea of helping to pay for it through stocks is excellent! Considering how many of us already spend so much money getting old hard backs and such, we could probably pull off a good chunk and get it the attention it needs. You should email him with the idea and/or take a poll to see how many of us would be willing to buy shares and how much. Maybe we can help get this thing off the ground!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    9

    Post

    i love the trilogy of John Clancy movies (hunt for red october, patriot games, & clear and present danger) BUT i haven't read the actual books yet. with 'Interview With a Vampire' i saw the movie before i read the book. where as with the Stephen King film adaptations, specifically 'Salems Lot (actually my mom & sister made me watch that when i was five but read the book at twelve and saw the movie a second time shortly thereafter) and The Stand, i have read the books first and really was annoyed at the blending or outright omission of characters and scenes. i try to make it a rule to avoid movies based upon books i've already read. right now i'm reading the anthology "Dream Cycle of H.P.Lovecraft". before i get to 'The Case of Charles Dexter Ward' i am going to see the movie 'the Resurrected', which i've heard is one of the few good adaptations of HPL. seeing the movie first and then reading story help remove the annoyance i tend to suffer. i'm willing to bet about half of you could have the same problem seeing the movie after reading the story. and i know if you're reading this you read at least one, if not all, of the Necroscope books.
    we all have our own very different mental images of people, places and events which take place between the covers of each and every Necroscope novel. for christ's sake my Harry doesn't even have an english accent, my Sir Keenan Gormley is my dad, and my Mary Keogh has my mother's voice. my Starside is the Bighorn Mtns. in Wyoming, USA. Stephen King addressed such complaints in one interview by comparing his readers to a kid who has a balonga sandwich in his lunch everyday, until one day he gets a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and says "what the hell is this?! i'm not going to eat this carp!" i for one am, regretably, one of those little kids.
    BUT i do admit, it is unbelievably fun to talk about who i think would fit this role or that role. and i absolutely love reading everyone's ideas as to which actors and actresses fit their mental images of BL's characters. after all, isn't the purpose of this messageboard just an exchange of ideas.
    but that's just my opinion, i could be wrong.

  19. #19

    Post

    I think a Necroscopse movie is an excellent idea.

    Best directors for it would have to be Tim Burton, Tarantino or John Woo for the action

    Lotsa CGI effects

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    11

    Post

    For one thing I think Anthony Hoppkins would make a great Lardis.And as for Mel Gibson,I think he might be a good Ben .I 've seen all of Mel's movies and I think he would pull off a good Ben.as for the others i'm still working that out.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •